These questions (ah man!). But since these questions are so exciting we have the opportunity to follow up with a blog post. So sit back and enjoy as we take you from confusion to conclusion. Can you show talking about the pros and cons of using architecture vs using microformats? I don't think we can really compare microformats directly Microformats are a form of structured data e.g. microdata and have a limited set of predefined properties. used in structured data which is currently only micro.
Data can be combined with. Although there are already discussions about plans to start using it. The future is bright due moible number data to the wide vocabulary offered and universal support from major search engines. Can this really be said about microformats? No this is an understandable markup but there is no universal support to sustain growth. Besides getting better rich summaries, of using patterns and microdata? Tagging items on a web page can provide a stronger overall definition of what the content really means. Wrote a great article on.
Blog posts deciphering semantic search intent. You only need to look at Google's recipe search as an example to see what the data contained in the markup we installed began to evolve. Did you notice any improvement in rankings after implementing the architecture? I personally haven’t seen integrating any form of structured data have a direct impact on rankings but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen in the near future. With the acquisition in 2017 and its new developments in semantic search on the horizon we can only guess that this will play an even bigger role. Micro data or micro.
發表於 14:47:33
